Opinion column: "Iván Roca" is an accomplice in the violation of the 6th commandment.

She defends her 33-year-old pedophile son 

Iván Roca is an accomplice in the violation of the 6th commandment: 

 "YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT UNCLEAN ACTS" (Exodus 20, 14) 

 During the afternoon of this Tuesday, February 9, the UDI (and evangelical) councilor of Lota Iván Roca issued strong statements, in order to protect his son accused of rape. He said, "IF YOU ARE A PARENT OF A MINOR, LOCK HER" without taking responsibility for the abuser. And the victim was only 12 years old. Then, at around 9:00 PM, he gave new statements further aggravating this matter. He indicated that with the aforementioned "they took it out of context", as well as the criticisms against him would respond to a Santiago fashion of feminism. -

Is the age difference understood? Or not!? 

A type of love relationship between A 33 YEAR OLD MAN and A 12 ’GIRL IS NOT NORMAL, for various reasons. It is due to age difference (which is fed up), also because an adult has the capacity for discernment (That is to say, he knows at least the limits of a minor and an adult). If that already seems aberrant, wait to see how the abuser is defended by his father and who is also a councilor from Lota (An authority elected by electoral suffrage, neither more nor less!). During this Tuesday he gave two statements, but in neither of these has he asked for a public apology. This caused a great impact and for two reasons: The topic has been Trading Topic on Twitter, being one of the most discussed issues by people on Social Networks, in the same way that it generated a totally transversal rejection (becoming a national topic) to such an extent that two right-wing influencers and very close to José Antonio Kast also criticized the fact. The councilor is UDI, remember! And as if that were not enough, the Municipality of Lota also published an official statement, said institution also criticizes the statements of the still councilor. But they are well-deserved fun in reality since the tone used by Mr. Roca (beyond not fitting with the empowerment that women are achieving in recent years) is a total cover-up from a criminal regardless of the blood tie he has with the rapist. Here we must differentiate three things, when it comes to a councilor (or any politician) who faces a clearly family conflict more when his son committed some type of adultery.

1- Humble Statements. 

2- Protective Statements (Moved by paternal sentiment) 

 3- Statements "to pant removed" (shameless)